29 C
Guwahati
Tuesday, April 13, 2021
More

    Dispur dilly-dallying on securing Land Rights of Indigenous: PVM

    The issue of reservation of land rights for indigenous people as recommended by the Clause 6 committee requires amendment of two Acts

    GUWAHATI: The Supreme Court senior advocate and convenor of Prabajan Virodhi Manch (PVM), an anti-influx body of the state, reminded the state government of its promises of securing the land rights of the indigenous people of the state.

    Blaming the state government for sitting over the report of the high-level committee for implementation of Cluse6 of Assam Accord, Hazarika said that the Sarbananda Sonowal led state government has been only giving false assurance to the people of the state.

    He mentioned that the issue of reservation of land for indigenous people as recommended by the Clause 6 committee where to reserve land and restrict sale and purchase of land amongst the indigenous population requires amendment of two Acts of the Assam Assembly namely Assam Land Revenue and Regulations, 1886 and the Assam Agricultural Land (Regulation of Reclassification and transfer for non-agricultural purpose) Act, 2015.

    “These state legislations, amendments have to be carried out by the state assembly. There is no role or power of the Central Government as regards land, which in terms of the Constitution of India the power to make laws is vested exclusively in the state assembly and state government,” Hazarika said.

    The SC lawyer added that while he was being appointed as the Commission by the apex court in 2015, he too in his report of October 4, 2015, recommended/suggested that to save the indigenous from foreign infiltration, necessary legislation should be brought in by the state assembly whereby the sale, purchase and ownership of land needed to be restricted to only those who were citizens of India in 1951 and residents in Assam and their descendants.

    That report was accepted by both the then Congress led state government and BJP led Central government.

    “This is the same recommendation which the Clause 6 committee has given five years later in its report. That the state government and the BJP leaders have no intention of protecting the indigenous and implementing the Clause 6 committee report is evident from their series of misstatements and pushing the responsibility onto the central Government, merely to hold out excuses for not implementing the report. This even includes implementation of the recommendation of the committee which relates to subjects and issues within the exclusive power and domain of the State Government and state legislature,” he alleged.

    Published:

    Follow TIME8.IN on TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, FACEBOOK and on YOUTUBE to stay in the know with what’s happening in the world around you – in real time

    First published

    TRENDING

    BREAKING: ULFA (I) warns of ‘Action’ against Tata’s Amalgamated Plantation in Assam

    The outfit said that the company's head office was outside Assam where no indigenous personnel from Assam were in employment

    Assam: Writer Sikha Sarma receives rape threat in Facebook

    Rongmon Nath, a student of Gauhati University, made derogatory remarks against Sikha Sarma in a Facebook post.

    Breaking | Sikha Sarma slapped with sedition charges, sent to judicial custody

    Sikha Sarma in a Facebook post refused to consider the soldiers killed in the Maoist attack in Chhattisgarh as martyrs

    Assam Phase III Polls: Fate of 337 candidates in fray including 25 women

    Election Commission of India is ready to conduct polling at 11,401 centers

    Ex-CM Bhumidhar Barman is stable, still in ICU: APCC

    Ex-CM Barman is being treated under the supervision of Dr Sohidul Alom Choudhury

    Breaking | Rhino kills forest staff in Manas National Park

    The incident was mourned in the entire Barpeta and Bajali regions

    Assam Polls: Mahajot Candidates Taken out of State in fear of ‘Horse Trading’?

    The state has recorded an overall 82.04% of votes in the three-phased polls